- Games
- RPGs
- Fable 4
Opinion | Playground's Fable dropping the karma meter is the smartest thing it can do
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
(Image credit: Xbox)
Share
Share by:
- Copy link
- X
Fable's legacy is memetic, if not iconic. The pursuit of poultry for its own sake. A broad spectrum of diversely unconvincing British accents. Playing subtle social games in high society by strategically dancing or farting. But no element resonates in people's memory more than its morality, as Fable as a series considered ethics to be so objective that characters could literally grow halos or devil horns, depending on their actions.
With the upcoming reboot, that's out the window. What we saw of Fable 4 in the recent showcase made it clear that your choices will no longer be labelled objectively good and evil – which means no more angelic or demonic transformations, depending on how much you tip your waiter. Some fans seem pretty disappointed by this, but I'm not one of them. Not only is that framing a relic of the times, unsuitable for the mid 2020s, but having gone back into them recently, the original three games convinced me that it's time to move on – there's nothing left for them to do.
Ethical heroism
Why Playground Games' ambitious open-world Fable reboot is a fresh start for the series
Fable's fascination with good and evil was locked in from the beginning, with the first game's cover art depicting an innocent Anakin Skywalker lookalike staring at a reflection in which their evil future self looms ominously. It was a game where you played a Hero, but in the context of Fable's lore, that word only meant "inherited magical superpowers" and didn't require any actual virtuousness from the player.
You may like-
Fable's "shades of gray approach to morality" directly ties into the RPG's living population
-
Fable's new morality system is "probably representative of how morality exists in the world that we live in today"
-
Fable doesn't have morphing and fans are divided: "It's what helped set Fable apart from other Middle Ages Western RPGs"
This being the mid-2000s, it was an early example of the "choices matter" obsession that gaming would eagerly run with for the next decade and beyond. Fable 1 and 2 took a very simple view of ethics. There was no ambiguity in those games, only the oppositional choice between valorous generosity and cruel selfishness. A player might be given two choices of quest, for example: defend a caravan of merchants from bandits, or side with the bandits. And no attempt to humanise the highwaymen either! No desperate people or honorable thieves, merely one-dimensional cutthroats, all black hoods and serrated blades. Even the neutral characters, like Garth in Fable 2, are aggressively neutral, as though to place themselves in the context of Albion's simplified extremes.
It is, to put it mildly, a naive view of the world, but I can't say it didn't make sense at the time. Fable's storybook tone, cartoonish humor, satirical edge and over-the-top characterisation lent itself to these simple portrayals of heroes and villains. But this approach came back to bite developer Lionhead in Fable 3.
Dork fantasy
You could build a utopia, but it'll be a damn short-lived one.
Fable 3 focuses around a revolution against a tyrant king – a good start – but as you play, that turns out only to cover the first two acts.After throwing the regent in the dungeon, he tells you that all his cruelty has been to prepare Albion for an eldritch horror that's on its way to slaughter everybody one year from now. Draining resources, keeping people in line – yeah, out of context it seems harsh, but actually it's all been to hold back the armies of Nyarlathotep and ensure that at least some of humanity might survive in the aftermath.
An interesting dilemma! And after ousting him from the throne, it means all the responsibility for holding back the cosmic evil now falls on you, including those same choices. In practice, that means a series of binary options representing harsh austerity and exploitation on the one hand, versus the noble-but-short-sighted policies on the other. Do you build more expensive orphanages for the kiddies, emptying the royal coffers, or send all those homeless brats to the armament factories? You could build a utopia, but it'll be a damn short-lived one.
Sign up to the GamesRadar+ NewsletterContact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.Sadly, Fable 3 shatters like glass under this pressure, as its systems just aren't built for moral complexity. For one thing, the ability to donate your own money means you can just do minigames for three days and pay for the war that way – hardly narratively satisfying or in keeping with any of the themes.But even if you're playing to the game's moral element, the characters around you don't acknowledge that additional pressure. It means all your harsher policies are still labelled as simply evil, even in the justifiable context of trying to save everybody's lives. And if you instead decide to fund the arts and save the whales, Albion will get slaughtered by underworld demons, yet the last handful of survivor NPCs in the rubble are still mindlessly cheering your wealth distribution policies. Your halo remains untarnished. Clearly, the execution here left something to be desired.
The moral of the story
In the years since Fable 3, gaming has turned away from binary good/bad morality almost entirely. The very notion of it now seems antiquated (just look at how the Fallout series dropped karma).Now it's far more about faction alignment and morally grey choices, which does make sense. Gaming has grown up – albeit slowly – and while narratives about objective good and evil aren't uncommon, they at least aim for a level of nuance. Life has never been as simple as horns and halos.
Fable 3 proved that complexity doesn't gel with objective, storybook morality, so if one of them has to be sacrificed…. Well, I'll be able to wear hats again. . Besides, turning the focus more onto Albion's population of bellowing, opinionated oafs can only make the game more interesting, not less. Playground's upcoming Fable looks to prioritize substance over style – and I'll take that over a Halloween costume.
Fable is one of the hottest upcoming RPGs on the way in 2026
CATEGORIES Xbox Series X PS5 PC Gaming Platforms Xbox PlayStation
Joel FraneySocial Links NavigationGuides Editor, GamesRadar+Joel Franey is a writer, journalist, podcaster and Very Tired Man with a BA from Brunel University, a Masters from Sussex University and a decade working in games journalism, often focused on guides coverage but also in reviews, features and news. His love of games is strongest when it comes to groundbreaking narratives like Disco Elysium, UnderTale and Baldur's Gate 3, as well as innovative or refined gameplay experiences like XCOM, Sifu, Arkham Asylum or Slay the Spire. He is a firm believer that the vast majority of games would be improved by adding a grappling hook, and if they already have one, they should probably add another just to be safe. You can find old work of his at Eurogamer, Gfinity, USgamer, SFX Magazine, RPS, Dicebreaker, VG247, and more.
Show More CommentsYou must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
Logout Read more
Fable's "shades of gray approach to morality" directly ties into the RPG's living population
Fable's new morality system is "probably representative of how morality exists in the world that we live in today"
Fable doesn't have morphing and fans are divided: "It's what helped set Fable apart from other Middle Ages Western RPGs"
Why Playground Games' ambitious open-world Fable reboot is a fresh start for the series: "This has to be Playground's Fable"
How Fable's open world fantasy lets you meddle in the lives of over 1000 living NPCs
Fable isn't a sequel, Playground Games lead says, because "we needed to reboot the franchise" and "put our stamp on it"
Latest in RPGs
Oblivion Remastered's wildest bug made me choose between losing achievements or living as a fugitive
Baldur's Gate 3, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 actor agrees with Charlie Cox that mocap actors deserve more recognition
Baldur's Gate 3 director agrees with No Rest for the Wicked lead that Early Access is "a positive thing" for games
Bethesda doesn't want to retcon Fallout lore, only add to it "in a way that doesn't spit in the eye of what came before"
Hope for a Kingdom Come: Deliverance PS5 port picks up momentum thanks to PlayStation Store leak
The Elder Scrolls 6 setting may have been decided when Bethesda was working on Fallout 4, former Skyrim lead teases
Latest in Features
Fable's black and white morality has been a dead weight since 2010 and I'm glad it's getting cut
I love Highguard's 2Fort-style sieges – when they actually happen
I'm loving Fallout season 2, but it suddenly has a Star Wars problem
There's no end in sight for official Pokemon Gengar gaming accessories, and I'm 100% okay with that
Everything you need to know about Disney Lorcana Winterspell
New Fallout solo RPG lets you go off the beaten track, no gamemaster or party required
GAME REVIEWSMOVIE REVIEWSTV REVIEWS
1This hidden role board game makes me feel like a puppet master, so Traitors fans should listen up | Veiled Fate review- 2Cairn review: "This climber has a grip on me – even when it loses its footing with awkward systems"
- 3The Doom Arena Board Game is hell on Earth (in the best way) | Preview
- 4This award-winning board game is a five star must-have
- 5Code Vein 2 review: "This vampire take on Elden Ring almost works, but the dungeons themselves lack bite"
1Return to Silent Hill review: "Neither an impressive adaptation nor coherent enough to act as a standalone film"- 228 Years Later: The Bone Temple review: "The wildest and weirdest entry into the franchise yet"
- 3Avatar: Fire and Ash review: "Still a technical marvel, with some of the year's best action filmmaking"
- 4Five Nights at Freddy's 2 review: "We have waited two years for a Five Nights at Freddy's 1.5"
- 5Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery review: "Brings Knives Out back to its roots for a sequel that's almost on a par with the original"
1Wonder Man review: "A low-key gem that's up there with the MCU's best"- 2Starfleet Academy review: "It may feel a little different to what we're used to, but this is Star Trek through and through"
- 3A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms review: "This Game of Thrones spin-off is a heartfelt and fun return to Westeros"
- 4Stranger Things season 5 finale review: “Shows off both the best and the worst of Hawkins”
- 5Stranger Things season 5, Volume 2 review: “All set up for a finale that has so much to deliver”
