Technology

These genes were thought to lead to blindness 100% of the time. They don't.

2026-01-15 18:30
706 views
These genes were thought to lead to blindness 100% of the time. They don't.

New research finds that retinal diseases thought to map one-to-one to genetic mutations are more complicated than that.

  1. Health
  2. Genetics
These genes were thought to lead to blindness 100% of the time. They don't.

News By Stephanie Pappas published 15 January 2026

New research finds that retinal diseases thought to map one-to-one to genetic mutations are more complicated than that.

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

illustration of a human eye with a DNA molecule in its pupil A new study may transform scientists' understanding of inherited blindness, as well as other genetic conditions. (Image credit: artacet/Getty Images) Share Share by:
  • Copy link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Whatsapp
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Flipboard
  • Email
Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter

Genetic variants believed to cause blindness in nearly everyone who carries them actually lead to vision loss less than 30% of the time, new research finds.

The study challenges the concept of Mendelian diseases, or diseases and disorders attributed to a single genetic mutation. The idea is that Mendelian diseases — such as the neurological disease Huntington's and the bleeding disorder hemophilia — are passed down in predictable ways in families, and if a given person carries a disease-causing mutation, they will have it.

You may like
  • Portrait of an Asian man in his 50s Color blindness linked to lower bladder cancer survival, early study hints
  • A brain scan overlapping a PCR test results. 5 genetic 'signatures' underpin a range of psychiatric conditions
  • Close-up of woman face while looking away. Injecting anesthetic into a 'lazy eye' may correct it, early study suggests

"What we suggest is that there is overlap there," senior study author Dr. Eric Pierce, director of the Ocular Genomics Institute at Mass Eye and Ear and an ophthalmologist at Harvard Medical School, told Live Science. In other words, many diseases thought to have simple, Mendelian causes might be a lot more complex than previously thought.

And this doesn't only apply to inherited blindness. Similar results have been found for other genes once thought to be strongly linked to health conditions. A 2023 study on ovarian insufficiency, a condition that causes infertility and early menopause, found that 99.9% of supposedly disease-causing variants were actually present in healthy women. And certain kinds of inherited diabetes also have more complex genetics than previously believed, according to 2022 research.

"We're in an era of discovering a lot more about the complexity of our genomes," said Anna Murray, a geneticist at the University of Exeter who led the ovarian insufficiency research.

Simple or complex?

Pierce and his colleagues focused on inherited retinal disorders (IRDs), a group of diseases that cause significant vision loss, sometimes as early as age 10 but certainly by age 40, said study co-author Dr. Elizabeth Rossin, a vitreoretinal surgeon and scientist in Mass Eye and Ear’s Retina Service and a Harvard ophthalmologist. Researchers have teased out the genetic roots of these diseases by doing genetic testing on affected patients and their families.

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter nowContact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

But that method can lead to a problem called ascertainment bias, Pierce said. True, you'll learn that some genetic variants are associated with the disease. But because you're studying only people with the disease and their relatives, you don't get a clear notion of how many people have the same gene variants and don't go blind.

To widen their view, the researchers used data from two large biobanks that contain genetic sequencing data from people, as well as their medical diagnoses and demographic information. One, the All of Us biobank, is a program run by the National Institutes of Health and included nearly 318,000 individuals with both genetic and electronic health record data at the time of the study. The other, the UK Biobank, is comparatively less diverse but contains data from 500,000 individuals, including about 100,000 with images of their retinas submitted to the database.

The researchers picked the 167 genetic variants thought to have the strongest causal link to IRDs and searched for them in the All of Us database. They then used the health record data to see if the people with the variants had vision loss. To their surprise, depending on which diagnostic codes they used, only 9.4% to 28.1% of people with the variants had any indication of a retinal disorder or vision problems.

You may like
  • Portrait of an Asian man in his 50s Color blindness linked to lower bladder cancer survival, early study hints
  • A brain scan overlapping a PCR test results. 5 genetic 'signatures' underpin a range of psychiatric conditions
  • Close-up of woman face while looking away. Injecting anesthetic into a 'lazy eye' may correct it, early study suggests

"You would expect, given what we know about these diseases, that nearly 100% of the people would have blindness," Rossin told Live Science. "But it was far fewer than that."

To validate their findings, the researchers turned to the UK Biobank, this time using the included retinal imagery to seek out evidence of IRDs themselves. They found that only between 16.1% and 27.9% carriers of the gene variants had indications of possible retinal disease.

People who were older who carried these retinal disease genes weren't any likelier to have gone blind. And there was no other evidence that their results were because they were catching people who might later lose their vision. Instead, Pierce says, it seems that the complexity of these presumed Mendelian diseases has been underestimated.

"The mutation we used to think caused disease 100% of the time doesn't exist in isolation," he said. Instead, people carry tens or hundreds of thousands of other genes, some of which may protect against retinal disease, he added.

New avenues for treatment

In theory, those protective gene variants could lead to ways to treat these retinal disorders.

"It's going to take a lot of data in order to find these types of low-effect variants," Pierce said. "There are likely many of them, each contributing a little bit to the protection against disease."

There are good reasons to study the genes of patients with particular disorders, Murray said. For instance, finding genes associated with a condition — even if they don't always cause it — can help researchers pinpoint the biology underlying the disease. In ovarian insufficiency, these kinds of patient-centered studies have shown that genes associated with DNA repair are important for the disorder. But such studies should still be taken with a grain of salt.

RELATED STORIES

—CRISPR can treat common form of inherited blindness, early data hint

—New cells discovered in eye could help restore vision, scientists say

—Woman's sudden blindness in 1 eye revealed hidden lung cancer

"It is only now that we have the ability to look at the granular detail of the genetic sequence in hundreds of thousands of people," she said. To learn more, these databases need to become more diverse, she added. And at the same time, she added, biomedical researchers need better lab models of diseases in which to test certain gene mutations and their effects.

"There are likely some [diseases] where it really is a one-to-one correspondence," Pierce said. "But my prediction would be [that] the majority of these disorders are going to share this new complexity."

The new findings appeared Jan. 8 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.

Editor's note: This story was updated on Jan. 16, 2026, to add mention of Dr. Eric Pierce's and Dr. Elizabeth Rossin's affiliations with Mass Eye and Ear, where the work was conducted.

Stephanie PappasStephanie PappasSocial Links NavigationLive Science Contributor

Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. 

Show More Comments

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Logout Read more Portrait of an Asian man in his 50s Color blindness linked to lower bladder cancer survival, early study hints    A brain scan overlapping a PCR test results. 5 genetic 'signatures' underpin a range of psychiatric conditions    Close-up of woman face while looking away. Injecting anesthetic into a 'lazy eye' may correct it, early study suggests    Illustration of an early modern man embracing a Neanderthal woman. They appear to be in a forest at night. The moonlight is shining through the trees just behind them 'More Neanderthal than human': How DNA from our long-lost ancestors affects our health today    Illustration of a close up of a DNA double helix with tweezers next to it holding a small piece of the DNA, presumably a nucleotide. From gene therapy breakthroughs to preventable disease outbreaks: The health trends that will shape 2026    illustration of a DNA molecule with a specific section highlighted DNA from ancient viral infections helps embryos develop, mouse study reveals    Latest in Genetics Artist illustration of four men in Roman armor fighting a snake-like creature. One of the warriors shields says "SPARDA" This is SPARDA: A self-destruct, self-defense system in bacteria that could be a new biotech tool    illustration of a DNA molecule with a specific section highlighted DNA from ancient viral infections helps embryos develop, mouse study reveals    Black and white portrait of Leonardo da Vinci. He has long white hair and a long white beard. He is wearing a black hat. Leonardo da Vinci's DNA may be embedded in his art — and scientists think they've managed to extract some    Illustration of an early modern man embracing a Neanderthal woman. They appear to be in a forest at night. The moonlight is shining through the trees just behind them 'More Neanderthal than human': How DNA from our long-lost ancestors affects our health today    A brain scan overlapping a PCR test results. 5 genetic 'signatures' underpin a range of psychiatric conditions    image of an X chromosome next to a Y chromosome on a blue background Woman had her twin brother's XY chromosomes — but only in her blood    Latest in News A red ribbon of radio energy blasts out of a black hole on a black background Scientists see monster black hole 'reborn' after 100 million years of rest    Young people riding stationary bike during indoor cycling class in gym. Tiny improvements in sleep, nutrition and exercise could significantly extend lifespan, study suggests    Portrait of an Asian man in his 50s Color blindness linked to lower bladder cancer survival, early study hints    Photo of a person stood in front of pink auroras in China Earth hit by biggest 'solar radiation storm' in 23 years, triggering Northern Lights as far as Southern California    An underwater photo of a diver at the Svælget 2 shipwreck site. Medieval 'super ship' found wrecked off Denmark is largest vessel of its kind    A zoomed-in view of a supernova in the early universe James Webb telescope discovers earliest Type II supernova in the known universe    LATEST ARTICLES